Comparing political systems: Towards positive theory development
By: Hans Keman Professor of Comparative Political Science Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Department of Political Science je.keman@fsw.vu.nl
This paper has been presented at a seminar held at the University of South Africa in 2003 and at the Annual meet of the Dutch Political Science Association (Antwerp) in 2005. I am grateful for the comments received on these occasions, in crabby from Murray Fauré [UNISA Pretoria], Michael Minkenberg [Frankfurt/Oder], Jan-Erik Lane [Geneva], Kees van Kersbergen [Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam] and Dietmar Braun [Lausanne].
1
Abstract: Much proportional degree look for is biased as well as modified by its way of case selection, which may well deprave the internal and external validity of the results. Furthermore, too often comparisons argon made without explicitly departing from theory-guided questions in relation to the research initiation developed. Finally, concurrent logics of inquiry due to case selection and research project are often insufficiently reflected upon. All this implies that relative political analysis remains shallow in growing new theoretical insights.
In this article these issues are increase and discussed. By means of three research traditions in comparative politics we demonstrate how positive theory development discharge be achieved by means of applying the comparative approach strictly and consciously. Essential is that theory comes before method to advance square-toed comparative analyses of politics and society.
Key Words: Comparative digest; Theory Development; Research Design; Methodology.
2
1. Introduction In 1921 Lord Bryce published a study of the constitutional design of democracy. His point of departure was that ample modern democracies were available to start a systematic comparative inquiry. The aim of such...If you want to unsex a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment