After reading the book, I decided to write my position written report on the content of Chapter3: The Ethical Gymnast. I can key out with several of the scenarios that Mazzeo describes in this chapter. During the past 14 years at Sears, I have observed several very connatural situations in my workplace.
Webster defines rationalization in this manner as to invent superficial, or plausible, explanations or excuses for ones acts, beliefs, or desires, usually without being conscious that these are not the real motives. This chapter describes several instances of how to rationalize a given situation. The first mannequin describes a situation of dating between a supervisor and their subordinate. There is no counselling to rationalize this type of behavior. Common sense will tell all of the adverse actions that could happen in this situation. I pretend that stupidity is an appropriate word to describe this example.
The second example describes a situation in which a gross sales representative negotiates a very good rate on letting a houseboat for a purchasing means that he routinely deals with. Mazzeo writes that this event constitutes a conflict of interest. I think the honourable part of this example would depend on the individual the great unwashed that were involved.
There are some sales people that unfeignedly would not expect the purchasing component to repay this promote. However, you do have to consider events that may happen dash off the road. An example of this event might be that the purchasing agent must buy a large shipment of lumber. He has narrowed it down to 2 suppliers. One happens to be the sales soulfulness who got him the boat rental. If the buyer picks that particular sales person and a third party finds out about the entirely situation, including the boat rental, it will look like the purchasing agent made...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper