Lawsuit Against Microsoft

For over a go the debate about Microsoft and whether or not it has engaged in monopolistic pulls has waged on through the courts. However, when Microsoft provided its profits browser for plain along with its Windows OS, competitors called it an unfair practice aimed at limiting consumer prime(prenominal) and stifling competition. At the time, browsers represented a growing securities effort and companies like Netscape Communication maintained the lead in securities manufacture share for such software. However, Microsoft's "bundling" of its OS and its browser was viewed as unfair by such competitors. In addition, when you purchased a computing machine with Windows OS, the OS on a majority of personal computers, Internet Explorer came with it and neither worked well without the otherwise. Further, Explorer could not be deleted and other browsers like Netscape

did not work as well with Windows OS because of Microsoft programming controls.

Wells, R. (Dec 12, 1997). settle Orders Microsoft to Quit Bundling Windows, Browser. Athens Daily, Viewed on July 14, 2003: http://www.onlineathens.

com/1997/121297/1212.a3microsoft.html, 1

While competitors and the DOJ felt such a practice as bundling represent the violation of antitrust laws by Microsoft, such is not the case. Much has changed in the high-tech industry since Microsoft was accused of monopolistic practices. The economy is performing poorly, the high-tech industry bubble has burst, sales of PCs are declining in favor of other technologies, and many electronics manufacturers of these devices are looking to other operating systems in order to avert any Microsoft monopolistic tactics. Many fence in that such charges against Microsoft are the stuff of sour grapes and invalid. This is m
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!