'Relationships and Human Behavior Perspectives Essay\r'

'Reviewing human fashions from varied lieus, including the five main perspectives of biological, reading, social and cultural, cognitive, and psychodynamic influences, can fewtimes shed light on why worldly concern act the way they do. Using these perspectives to review how affinitys begin, develop, and argon maintained can provide a deeper consciousness and context of this phenomenon. Framing love kins with these variant perspectives likewise helps to show how the perspectives themselves differ or are identical in relation to how they consider relationships as existence formed and maintained.\r\nThe biological perspective contends that immanent causes labour human behavior. Specific all in ally, this perspective states that the actions of the nervous system and patrimonial heredity lead to different events of behavior (McLeod, 2007). From this perspective, hormonal reactions and feelings of reinforcement in the brain that are associated with a particular individual lead quite a little to scrawl relationships (McLeod, 2007). Additionally, the relationship is maintained because humans have an inwrought longing to reproduce and pass their own genic material on to their offspring, and in order to motility this urge, the brain continues to trigger feelings of pleasure and hormonal releases to gird the association surrounded by a given soulfulness and good feelings (McLeod, 2007). This perspective is somewhat unique from the other ones in how it views relationships, because it involves that advanced cognitive processes are non even necessary for a relationship to decease; instead, only biochemical processes are contractd.\r\nThe next type of perspective, the cultivation perspective, claims that learning by dint of association leads to peculiar(prenominal) behaviors, and that individuals get divulge generally learn to enact behaviors that they natter are rewarded (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). From this perspective, humans form relationships because they recognize other relationships, such as those of their parents, externally rewarded, and incur to associate the nonion of â€Å"love” with reward. The rewards that one receives from a relationship, such as attention, compassion, or even fiscal security, are associated with â€Å"love” over time, which strengthens the relationship and makes people more likely to maintain a relationship after they have been gnarled in it for some time (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013).\r\nLike the biological perspective, the learning perspective deems relationship behavior as something beyond humans’ conscious control and does not needfully require conscious thought, although the learning perspective does not claim to jockey the internal processes that drive it, and it does require that humans have at least the ability to learn in order for them to be involved in relationships (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013).\r\nSocial and cultural perspectives claim th at humans are ingrained with what constitutes â€Å"right” behavior through socialization. Because people grow up, in many another(prenominal) cases, in households with married parents, or at least where the parents date other individuals, children learn early on that relationships are not only acceptable, merely actually desirable (McLeod, 2007). This notion is shape up reinforced through messages given to the child through the media, their friends and other family members, and close to people they come in contact with, all of whom deem â€Å"love” to be one of the highest goals a individual can achieve.\r\nIndividuals therefore seek proscribed relationships in their teen years because they have been told that it is a positive objective to strive toward, and they are further reinforced in their views by their partner and others who know them after dating or getting married, which leads the someone to continue their relationship (McLeod, 2007). This perspective is unlike the learning and biological perspectives in that it does not rely on reflexes or innate drives, but instead requires Byzantine thought, and, moreover, socialization; a person living impertinent of society would likely have no desire to be in a relationship, according to this perspective.\r\nThe cognitive perspective claims that human thought is what drives all behavior. In this sense, then, humans enter relationships because they see relationships as something that they desire, and which will provide them with some type of enjoyment or reward for seeking out (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). If they settle that they do receive some type of upbeat from dating a person, they will make the decisiveness to develop the relationship further, learning more roughly the person and perhaps even getting married, if they deal that they are sufficiently compatible with the other person for the relationship to last and continue to be recognize (Mikkelson & Pauley, 2013). This perspective, like the social and cultural perspective, is in truth reliant on human thought as a driver of relationships, but the cognitive perspective deems relationships an individual choice rather than a go away of societal pressure.\r\nLastly, the psychodynamic perspective contends that behavior is due to interactions between the conscious and the subconscious mind. A relationship capacity begin because a member of the opposite call down might remind an individual of the loving relationship they had with their parents, but in order to sublimate the unfitting desire for one’s parents, the individual seeks out a relationship with a person distant of their family. The relationship is maintained because it provides the person with ego fulfilment (McLeod, 2007).\r\nLike the cognitive and social perspectives, the psychodynamic perspective describes relationships in terms of human thought and cognitive activity, but unlike those other perspectives, the psychodynamic outlook believes that humans are essentially bound to enter into relationships, because it ascribes the behavior to innate drives. In this sense, the psychodynamic perspective is somewhat like the biological perspective. All of these different perspectives, then, can provide different types of insight into human relationships.\r\nReferences\r\nMcLeod, S. (2007). Psychology Perspectives. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/ Mikkelson, A. C., & Pauley, P. M. (2013). increase Relationship Possibilities: Relational Maximization in quixotic Relationships. Journal Of Social Psychology, 153(4), 467-485. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.767776\r\n'