CAUSAL ARGUMENT ONAFFIRMATIVE ACTION2005Inequalities , unfairness , racial separation , and separationism , to discern a few , be common dustup that we lots hear in our daily activities to describe the rest in treating one to another . The inequalities might come in divers(a) forms and it happens not solitary(prenominal) in the working surroundings (offices , firms , etc ) but in any case in our homes when we love our daughters than boys or in education validations when we select students based on ethnicity rather than on the capability , for in perspectiveConcerning the race in education system , the U .S . Supreme judiciary on June 23 , 2003 yieldd a bound decision involving admissions policies at the University of Michigan and its law indoctrinate that deliver the goods have far-reaching implications for American higher(prenominal) education for years to comeIn yoke decisions involving the cases of Gratz v . Bollinger and Grutter v . Bollinger , the supreme apostrophize not simply upheld racial and ethnic diversity as a start out state interest at the University of Michigan but withal reaffirm the importance of giving whole colleges and universities flexibility in the admissions process University of Michigan and Affirmative serve , 2003In Grutter , it upheld the law schooldays program that sought a critical mass of minorities by a 5 to 4 vote , with Justice Sandra two dozen seconds O Connor siding with the majority to decide the case . The judiciary split six to three in Gratz to find the undergrad program unconstitutional , with Chief Justice William H . Rehnquist drop a line the majority opinion come University of Michigan and Affirmative go through , 2003The question of the legality of the University of Michigan s affirmative fulfill policies has button the nat ion s produce because its opponents are arg! uing that the programs are change because they violate national law which applies equ bothy in every states within the U .S . It is the University of Michigan s position that its policies are licit and that they are the best options available to it for increasing diversity in higher education .
Even if the University of Michigan altered its affirmative operation policies , it would not end the argument as gigantic as other human race universities and private universities that accept federal funds maintain affirmative action programs (Fox News , 2003In this stance , we might raise two questions regarding th e case of affirmative action in the University of Michigan . First , whether the use of race issue as criterion in the admission process is static valid in today s education system . hour , what kind of admission structure that meets the needs of an educational base and the federal law in to avoid conflict with the court s prohibition against quotasConcerning the first issue , the U .S . Supreme greet has long recognized that `education is the very foundation of fitting citizenship . For this reason , the diffusion of knowledge and opportunity through humankind institutions of higher education must be accessible to all individuals regardless of race or ethnicity (Fox News , 2003The decisions made by the Supreme Court regarding the case of affirmative action in University of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper