Oliver cromwell

In January 1649, King Charles I was executed, his death warrant signed by Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell became the new ruler of England and in his reign he achieved roughly controversial accomplishments. In this essay I will valuate whether these acts made him a hero or a villain, utilize contemporary views, quotes and other sources which give different interpretations.

One of Cromwells major assets was the crude Model Army, which he established and used to defeat the Kings army. As a military drawing card, Cromwell did both substantially and bad things, and at that place are differing opinions of whether he and his army overall were heroic or villainous. Some historians believe the New Model Army was check and efficient, with a fantastic founder and military leader. It had only Generals of cracking ability, not great nobility, unlike the Kings army. This may have been the apprehension for its success; but some say it also had Gods happen on its side.

However, in other ways during his time as a military leader Cromwell can be seen as a villain. He may be guilty of nepotism, favouring certain(p) people and promoting common people, as many were on his side. The event that he had many peasants on his side, unskilled in fighting, provokes the sway that it was numbers, not skill that won him the war.



Cromwell himself was in fact that a farmer before the civil war, thus do people to doubt his ability as a general. however success against the King made Cromwell many enemies during the war, almost cancelling issue the allies he made.

Therefore interpretations of Cromwell as a military leader differ because he did things that may be seen as good or bad, like the defeating of the Kings army. He believed strongly in the rights of woeful people and...

If you want to get a full essay, orderliness it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper