The Wilcoxes, with the exception of Ruth, are ?journalism? rather than ?literature?. Although slightly of their qualities, for spokesperson their efficiency and Henry?s money-making skills, can be admired, it is almost impossible not to let their worse traits turn over these when forming an opinion on them.
Charles is the ?Wilcoxes at their worst? personified. He is materialistic, hard-hitting and self centred. In chapter 21, he follow outs his father and Margaret?s designation as a financial threat and takes it out on his poor wife, blaming her for it in an obscure and unfair way, when in circumstance Margaret has no intention of interrupting their inheritance. Charles of course would never be adequate to see this ? he is suspicious and believes they have ulterior motives for their fundamental interaction with his family, and proceeds to use Dolly to reprobate for being ?on toast? financially. In this chapter he is also unreasonable to the highest degree this Schlegel?s, he threatens them to Dolly, warning they must be ?on their best(p) behaviour? or else he?ll ?put [his] foot downwardly?. This again illustrates this unreasonable and aggressive nature that seems to be a common factor among the family.
Chapter 22 opens with Margaret?s intentions of changing Henry, circumstances him build ?the rainbow bridge that should connect the prose in us with the choler?, she wanted to ?span their lives with beauty?. But, even at this ahead of condemnation stage, she realises this is not possible, due to his ?obtuseness?. He sees things in blackness and white, and this annoys Margaret, in even the simplest conversation she can see ?the milestones, the collisions, the innumerable views?. She brings this up with Henry, but in is narrow mindedness he cannot see the sense in ?frittering away [his] strength on that test of thing?. Henrys motto is ?Concentrate?, which he believes works rise for him but inevitably by concentrating hard on except one thing at any given time he fails to see the bigger picture or the ? verse line? in life which Margaret cares so deeply about.
Another example of his obtuseness and complete disregard for other peoples feelings when he sedately says ?Not a bad job that Porphyrion?, after the Schlegel?s have told Leonard Bast, on Henry?s advice to leave on that point and find another job. After he drops this bombshell on the sisters, he goes straight on to talk about a letter he?s had, and almost alone ignores Margaret?s attempts to find out what he meant by this. His own business problems and worries are always the centre of his conversations. He also completely denies all responsibility for Leonards immediately reduced salary, saying that this is exclusively ?part of the battle of life?. He seems to even blame the sisters for feeling sorry for him, rather than accept responsibility for Leonard now having even less money.
Bibliography: Howards End (E. M. Forster) & my own head.If you want to welcome a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper