Evaluate Aristotles argument(s) for his claim that contentment (eudaimonia) is the goal of human race life.
In evaluating Aristotles arguments for his claim that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life, I believe it is important to cut the true problem at hand, which can be seen to be, does Aristotle trace rock that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life? I believe that overall Aristotle does not succeed in arguing this point barely that he does provide some truly sound arguments in defending some of his opinions.
Aristotle believed that all human activities aim at some good and for this reason, he ab initio defines the good as that at which all things aim. For example, medicinal drug seeks wellness just like learning seeks knowledge. Both health and knowledge are thought to be good but at the same time they are also seen to be ends. Aristotle viewed ends as beingness either activities or the harvest-tides that are produced by the activities e.g. the activity of flute playing is an end while a house is also seen to be an end as it is the product of the activity of house-building. But some ends are clearly overcome to others.
Aristotle used the example of Bridle making, which glitters under the ruse of riding, along with every other military action, which all fall under the art of strategy. Clearly on that point is a keep down art for which all others are subordinate to, and so, it is for the sake of the condition that the latter are pursued. In other words, there is an end which man desires purely for its own sake with everything else being desired for the sake of this. This final end, Aristotle called the promontory Good. Aristotle thought that if we knew what this Chief Good was, then...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper