September 11: Consequences For Canada -book Review

Book Review - family 11 : Consequences for Canada by Kent circuit . 2003 Montreal and Kingston : McGill-Queen s University Press . 272 pagesKent Roach provides a masterful outline of the changes shaping Canadian politics in the aftermath of the September 11 , 2001 (henceforth , 9 /11 ) terrorist strikes . His central theme is to explore to what degree changes had occurred in post-9 /11 Canada from a legal and policy-making point of view . To establish the same , Roach looks at Canadian formulas since Black Tuesday and the greater policy-related questions of military strength , in-migration and foreign policy p The terrorist strikes of 9 /11 in the USA - the World Trade Center in reinvigorated York and the Pentagon in Washington D .C . - have served to establish a new of international relations , marked by a palpable fear of catastrophic terrorism , the fright of prosprightlinessration of weapons of push-down store destruction to non-state actors such as the al-Qaeda , and the burgeoning War on Terror The question remains , however , as to whether this set on marks the emergence of a hitherto unknown panic or only the etching of an existing affliction into familiar perception . Kent Roach challenges conventional wisdom to take the latter(prenominal) view , saying that the novelty of 9 /11 was the vulnerability that it instilled in the minds of the west in general , and North Americans in particular . For the author the attacks only accelerated a add together of pre-existing attacks already faced by Canada (Roach , 15Indeed , Roach s epitome is somewhat supportable in view of long-drawn problems with terrorism elsewhere in the world , especially in the Middle atomic number 99 , South Asia and Africa . What 9 /11 changed , however , was the response of countries , specially the USA and Canada , to the threat of terrorism . A substantial batch of Roach s book deals with the post-9 /11 changes in Canadian legislation , especially the hastily passed Anti-Terrorism Act ( observation C-36 ) of 2001 .

A review of Canada s pre-Bill C-36 guilty laws reveals that the same already threatened the most severe punishments , including life imprisonment . In such a situation , Bill C-36 only managed to enlarge the scope of the state s power in arbitrarily identifying several kinds of activities - even anti-globalization protests and illegal strikes (Roach 2003 : 5 ) - as terrorist behavior . This was in keeping with the sweeping changes that m whatsoever countries fleetly instituted in to deal with the specter of the new transnational superterrorist (Cotler . In effect , all that the new bill succeeded in doing was to change the particular nature of crimesRoach s legal analysis is remarkably level-headed . He maintains that the functional problems of instituting the Anti-Terrorism Act before any complementary color consequence management efforts indicates the Canadian government was too calibre to publicly display that necessary measures were being taken to quotation the threat of terrorism . This preoccupation with actors (terrorists , rather than their actions (terrorism , worries Roach virtually the future prospects of minority rights and civil liberties that have been so fast guarded through Canada s historyIt is also difficult to establish any correlation...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper